Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 22(9): 1261-1262, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2016278

Asunto(s)
Fiebre , Humanos
2.
Afr J Lab Med ; 9(2): 1365, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1266805
3.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 21(8): 1069-1070, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1213858
4.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 21(9): e290-e295, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1164688

RESUMEN

WHO recommends a minimum of 80% sensitivity and 97% specificity for antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), which can be used for patients with symptoms consistent with COVID-19. However, after the acute phase when viral load decreases, use of Ag-RDTs might lead to high rates of false negatives, suggesting that the tests should be replaced by a combination of molecular and serological tests. When the likelihood of having COVID-19 is low, such as for asymptomatic individuals in low prevalence settings, for travel, return to schools, workplaces, and mass gatherings, Ag-RDTs with high negative predictive values can be used with confidence to rule out infection. For those who test positive in low prevalence settings, the high false positive rate means that mitigation strategies, such as molecular testing to confirm positive results, are needed. Ag-RDTs, when used appropriately, are promising tools for scaling up testing and ensuring that patient management and public health measures can be implemented without delay.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Prueba de COVID-19/normas , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
6.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 20(9): e245-e249, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-654310

RESUMEN

The collapse of global cooperation and a failure of international solidarity have led to many low-income and middle-income countries being denied access to molecular diagnostics in the COVID-19 pandemic response. Yet the scarcity of knowledge on the dynamics of the immune response to infection has led to hesitation on recommending the use of rapid immunodiagnostic tests, even though rapid serology tests are commercially available and scalable. On the basis of our knowledge and understanding of viral infectivity and host response, we urge countries without the capacity to do molecular testing at scale to research the use of serology tests to triage symptomatic patients in community settings, to test contacts of confirmed cases, and in situational analysis and surveillance. The WHO R&D Blue Print expert group identified eight priorities for research and development, of which the highest is to mobilise research on rapid point-of-care diagnostics for use at the community level. This research should inform control programmes of the required performance and utility of rapid serology tests, which, when applied specifically for appropriate public health measures to then be put in place, can make a huge difference.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/metabolismo , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Betacoronavirus/genética , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Trazado de Contacto/métodos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/metabolismo , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/metabolismo , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , ARN Viral/análisis , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores de Tiempo , Triaje/métodos , Esparcimiento de Virus
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA